If you repeat a defamatory statement, you are just as liable as the originator. There are countless websites/blogs/online articles that express a writer opinion. Even major talk show host, starts with “O” was sued for slander because of her slander about beef…
It is the responsibility of the prosecution or hurt party that must do the work for monetary or legal results, not the defendant. Libel comments, which are those that are written, are easier to prosecute. Those that refuse to get rid of such comments when commanded by court have paid the price dearly, in extra fines and lose of permits.
Let it be a lesson that suing for slander is to be taken seriously and not ignored, nor any court order. It may not be murder, but suing for slander, when successful, should be obeyed.
What you must have:
• Adequate evidence
• Details of damage
• Method of damage
• Witnesses to the damage
• Witnesses to the slander
After one must determine where or the not the damage or slander has had significant damage. Freedom of speech is only the freedom in a sense. If you have abused it, you could be sued or if you’re reading this then probably you are the one considering suing for slander. A single act can be evidence enough.
The world wide web – suing for slander
Slander here is quite different and just as harmful. Suing for slander based on what you find on the web is difficult as it can be easily manipulated; however, a savvy tech person knows what to do. Anything that can damage the popularity of a person or organization can still be sued. It’s still complicated and rare that web based slander is sued for. Images can be enough as well. All forms of media can be evidence.
Suing for Slander on the web – the start
When your lawyer attempts suing for slander, he/she must prove with all the tools mentioned about how you were harmed and who did the damage. As soon as your lawyer has all these tools and evidence he can begin the case. Good luck Suing for slander.